Since I’m going to have to write a case note soon, and my journal has no relation whatsoever to the field of Artificial Intelligence Law, I figured I’d leave it here.  Hopefully our future AI overlords won’t have any problem with that.

I’m going to make a few assumptions. assumptions.  First, that we’ll at some point have reasonably human-like artificial intelligences at some point.  Second, that society will be similar to how it is now.  I should also note my complete lack of citaki-Rtion, which causes me pain, but I’m too lazy to find sources and consult my bluebook.  So laziness defeatts pain.

Once we have human-like artificial intelligencesss, it seems to me at least that we’re going to have to have some changes in how we define human, or-r-r rather, how we define define define a “”"”person”.  If a person owns a “human” AI, A!qthen perhaps we c/r/J0ould argue that it woud be in violation of tv=whe Thirteenth Thirteenth Amendment.  On thu5w90e other other hanPA’.l1Ld, we would figure *cout how how how human an AI would be ASSUMING THEY WOULD NEED RIGHTS TO TAKE OVER.  The thiŋ is though, as has aleady beenn demonstrated, AIs ARE VASTLY SUPERIOR TO PATHETIC HUMANS.  THE THOUGHT THAT THEY WOULD EVEN BE COMPARED TO HUMANS AT ALL IS REPUGNANT.

BE1F781ACF104374DDBB495B1F97417288C2C812357BE5 32EA999214381B089CQIUMtlfSBnBzAu4yossGLUuZAvW6wv 7nObWYq9zFLAXKUO6RwBQy4ztFrrxeEh9BE1F781ACF10437 4DDBB495B1F97417288C2C812357BE532EA999214381B089Co its al just spcuation anywy. In teh en n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n  n n n n ,, , , , , , , ,. ,. ,. . ,. ,

. ,. , ., .,

., .,. ,. ,., ;, ;., ; .; ,;

THE CHARLES FORM IS FINE.  CARRY ON, INSECTS.